Diferenças entre edições de "Discussão:The camera never lies?, Brookesmith, Peter, UFO updates mailing list, internet, January 1997"

Fonte: Futuro Da Humanidade
(Comment provided by Shamballa - via ArticleComments extension)
 
(Comment provided by Sarah - via ArticleComments extension)
 
(Há uma edição intermédia do mesmo utilizador que não está a ser apresentada)
Linha 9: Linha 9:
  
 
--[[User:Shamballa|Shamballa]] 18:20, 17 April 2011 (BST)
 
--[[User:Shamballa|Shamballa]] 18:20, 17 April 2011 (BST)
 +
</div>
 +
== Sarah said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
I couldnt take this article seriously, cause the writer came into the discussion with the obvious objective to disprove meier, not objectively investigate. Which is not scientific by the way.
 +
 +
--[[User:Sarah|Sarah]] 20:26, 21 April 2012 (BST)
 +
</div>
 +
== Sarah said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
I couldnt take this article seriously, cause the writer came into the discussion with the obvious objective to disprove meier, not objectively investigate. Which is not scientific by the way.
 +
 +
--[[User:Sarah|Sarah]] 20:26, 21 April 2012 (BST)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Edição atual desde as 19h26min de 21 de abril de 2012

Comments on The camera never lies?, Brookesmith, Peter, UFO updates mailing list, internet, January 1997 <comments />


Shamballa said ...

does anyone know where to contact Bill Spaulding I was a former member of GSW and would like to get in touch with him

--Shamballa 18:20, 17 April 2011 (BST)

Sarah said ...

I couldnt take this article seriously, cause the writer came into the discussion with the obvious objective to disprove meier, not objectively investigate. Which is not scientific by the way.

--Sarah 20:26, 21 April 2012 (BST)

Sarah said ...

I couldnt take this article seriously, cause the writer came into the discussion with the obvious objective to disprove meier, not objectively investigate. Which is not scientific by the way.

--Sarah 20:26, 21 April 2012 (BST)