Discussão:Thoughts about belief, the truth, and proving the authenticity of the Meier case

Comments on Thoughts about belief, the truth, and proving the authenticity of the Meier case <comments />

---

Hawaiian said ...

I would have to agree, that "Power" is just a perception by others of some greatness beyond their capacity, so they look to leaders for guidance. Yet, within each lies the most powerful "potentials", if one adheres to the Creational attributes and inter-connections that bind each and every intelligent entity.

Leaders in "power" have the opportunity to either manifest its true potentials by elevating not just their evolution, but more importantly the evolution of those they have "power" over. Which unfortunately appears not the case in most circumstances.

Therefore, the true "Power" is the sincereness of one's sacrifice in becoming the "foundation" for others to stand on and further develop their "potentials" of evolutionary attributes in order to finally merge into the Absolute BEING.

In order words, "Power" is to be shared not hoarded.

--Hawaiian 20:47, 14 May 2010 (BST)

Mark said ...

I believe that material power is our current trend as of late. Money, military might, who you know is viewed as power. Power can be dangerous because it can overwhelm the decisions man makes. If one were to take a step back and analyze you would find none of the material things would have come to be without the greatest power which is knowledge. Knowing about power and utilizing it in whatever manner you choose is a balancing act. Unfortunately since the earliest times man has used power to manipulate and gain more without looking for it's true meaning. It's always about getting more or sucking the life out of everything until it is no more. Until we can apply a balanced use of power we will have many challenges ahead.

--Mark 02:02, 15 May 2010 (BST)

Rigel Rozanski said ...

Thanks for clarification of the difference between belief and knowledge, I had read the difference before but was never before able to conceptualize it in concise terms!

--Rrozansk 20:45, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Hawaiian said ...

One should be careful and not “lock” themselves into absolute concepts or terms like “belief”, for doing so prevents further Creational evolution which is a process that continuously evolves forever. You can only look towards the negative results of religious dogmas and its insane “beliefs” of some absolute god and now the clergy who “administer” such insanity.

Instead one should replace belief with “AWARENESS” which is much more suitable for each entity, since each are unique in character, personality, intelligence, experience and other attributes including their inter-connections from their past to the present and further that also connects its appropriate time/space and dimensional aspects of reality.

Each has its own unique approach to these matters because of free will and knowledge which should not be restricted by any belief(s), for doing so evolution is replaced with stagnation.

It is awareness that “provides” the necessary pathways for further knowledge and evolution, since it’s “essence” are valid in both the material and non-material realms of Creation because “it” (for a better word?) interfaces amongst the exchange of energies that exist in both realms.

Awareness is just one of various other “mechanisms” available to both beings/BEINGs, but plays a very important role, none-the-less.

--Hawaiian 23:28, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Karl said ...

That's why those who worry about the wedding cake ufo their entire life are those who actually stick to their current belief (or their religion) instead of looking in deep about this. These are also those who don't want to know the turth, they just want to stick with their religion.

--Whitehalls 10:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Francis T said ...

I have seen many UFO's and just accepted that they are there, to me they are just visitors and although many fanciful tales have sprung up about them and equally fanciful sceptical denials and explanations. And I came across Meier only recently and for the first time it makes sense. Maybe 'belief' isn't really needed just the ability to see the sense in what is there. Most of Meier's spirituality seems to be just good sense and practical actions. Bless him I say he is a little treasure.

--Francis T 21:30, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

BraveKnight said ...

Words of wisdom,indeed

--BraveKnight 20:03, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Hawaiian said ...

Belief should be replaced by Awareness, a more appropriate term, since belief "locks" one's mindset for further investigations. Awareness always "keep the door open" for additional inquires or input should that avenue require such measures in response to technical advances or evolutionary developments.

Scientists first develop a theory, than run experiments to validate such approaches based on established directives that are repeatable under certain conditions, which are further developed into Laws. However even such Laws must never be turned into beliefs which are "cut in stone" for doing so restricts further developments, there will always be that uncertain variable to ensure the evolutionary progressive measures.

--Hawaiian 11:11, 30 March 2011 (BST)

Jamesm said ...

test

--Jamesm 10:36, 3 April 2011 (BST)